BLOG.LIZMICHAEL.COM: Recent Comments

Comment on Obama for President

software developer — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:33:07 GMT

That was an inspiring post,
I was an avid supporter of Obama from across the seas... he managed to gain interest from people who would usually not care about politics...
Anyway, thanks for the post

Comment on I must resign my membership in the Democratic Party

Victor — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:34:45 GMT

"The Role of the Liberals"

[researcher's note: Communists use liberals; Liberals as allies of Communism]

researcher's note: For 25 years the operational arm of Communist electoral politics has been in the Liberal wing of the DEMOCRATIC PARTY]

"Our electoral policy has for some 25 years been expressed in the phrase "the three legs of a stool"...";
"... the concept was built on the idea that when the other two legs, namely, the Communist Party and the forces of political independence, get strong enough, then and only then would the stool sit on three legs. But until that day comes the one operating leg would be the liberal wing of the Democratic Party."

"Is that not how it has in fact operated?" [page 37]

[researcher's note: Communist strategies are carried out through the Democratic Party.]

"... thus in practice the only operational electoral leg was the movement around the Liberal Democratic Party candidates."
"... the one operational leg ... That is the policy of supporting liberal Democrats as the main electoral activity."
"If there were ideas about capturing control, of making the Democratic party into a people's party, how could there be a serious struggle to break masses away from that kind of a Democratic Party?" [page 38]
"The 'Lesser Evil' Concept"

"... still see the Democratic party as the only practical vehicle..." [page 40]

"Electoral Role of the communist Party"

* Corrupt the young: get them away from religion. Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial; destroy their ruggedness.
* Get control of all means of publicity. Get peoples' minds off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books, plays and other trivialities.
* Divide people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance.
* Destroy the peoples' faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule and . (speak against, condemnatory utterances)
* Always preach true democracy; but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible.
* By encouraging government extravagance, destroy its credit; produce fear of inflation, rising prices and general discontent.
* Foment strikes in vital industries; encourage civil disorders and foster a lenient and soft attitude on the part of government toward these disorders.
* By special argument cause a breakdown of the old moral virtues; honesty, sobriety, continence, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness.
* Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext with a view of confiscation of them and leaving the population helpless. -- from Set Up and Sold Out, by Holly Swanson, published by C.I.N. Publishing

You and others like you have been behind the knowledge curve for quite sometime...say thirty-seven years behind

Comment on I must resign my membership in the Democratic Party

David Powell — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:45:11 GMT

Word up. I don't think that the people writing this idiocy thought it through. Abortion is something that a lot of people are not cool with for religious reasons. Saying they will not only be forced to send money to the insurance companies, even if they don't want that kind of insurance, is bad enough - where does the government require people pay to a company in the constitution? However making people pay for abortions if they don't believe in them is sick. I have a feeling quite a few people will do a Thoreau and not pay in for that belief, and the more that don't the bigger the problem they will have in DC. Unless it is a way to weed out the hard Anti-Abortion lobby via the excuse of non payment to jail them. Either way it is screwed up, and the bribes and back door deals are disgusting. Then again a lot of the same writers of this bill screwed up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and looted the accounts dry, and they were rewarded with control of the Senate, Congress and the White House by the Taxpayers last November. Well, in a Democracy one gets the government that the people vote for. However I can't see a lot of people liking this. Going thi deep in debt in a recession is insane, and going this deep into peoples' lives is sick and unconstitutional.

Comment on Joel McNally: gun grabbing moron

agitator — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:21:42 GMT

"the military doesn't carry them and neither do the police. So I am perfectly comfortable with that."

Actually, the military and police regularly carry shotguns with barrels shorter than 18" which is the minimum required barrel length for "civilians", i.e., citizens. The USSC Miller case involving the National Firearms Act of 1934 only held that the federal government could tax the transfer of short-barreled shotguns and machineguns, not that they could prohibit them outright. Reagan's 1986 foolish acquiesence to the appeasers at the NRA only prevented the public sale of newly manufactured machineguns, not the taxable transfer of those already in circulation. The license to obtain a short-barreled shotgun is a recognition that the required transfer tax has been paid and involved an ATF background check, the payment of a $5 "other weapon" tax (may have increased), and is usually subject to vague objections from local police (unconstitutional). So you should not be "comfortable".

Comment on GIVE ME YOUR GUNS!!!

Sean McNerney — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:56:04 GMT

Liz I'm very suprised at your insightfulnes and genuine reporting, I am a fed up liberatarian, yet you somehow calm my anger with your forth right reporting, can we get these other news agencies to do the same? that would be nice for a change. I think they call it unbiased reporting, is that for real?

Comment on You people probably want to know what I'm doing and thinking

David E. Powell — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:16:16 GMT

Hello from an old time RSPW poster! Glad to see you up on the web and I hope all is well with you!

I'll check this page out, I wonder what you are thinking about the Global Warming email thing?

Anyway big ups to you Liz Michael!

Comment on CLINTON: US TO ENFORCE ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN - WHAT ARE YOUR COMMENTS?

Poquer — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:52:31 GMT

Hey i like your post.and it seems you are a great observer.thats true what you said that if it goes this way it will surely going to destroy the Obama agenda.

Comment on You people probably want to know what I'm doing and thinking

Strider — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 08:02:59 GMT

Good luck trying to put down secession this time around, with a military that's exhausted, demoralized and tied down halfway across the world. Not to mention the fact it's proven itself utterly incapable of handling guerrilla warfare, which is what they'd face here as well. They can barely hold on to Iraq and are about to learn the hard way why Afghanistan is the "graveyard of empires." Now try to imagine them successfully invading & occupying Alaska.

Had the South waged a guerrilla war in 1861 rather than field stand-up armies, they'd have prevailed. It would likely have taken 10-15 years, but in the end they would have won.

At any rate, the military would fracture along racial lines early in the breakup, and the black units -- poorly trained, undisciplined, and led by incompetent affirmative-action officers -- would quickly be obliterated.

Comment on You all don't know what we had on McCain

Luke Alexander — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:36:06 GMT

Too late for this, but, what happens next?

Comment on GIVE ME YOUR GUNS!!!

Allan — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:30:07 GMT

As a frequent visitor (and snowbirder) to Mexico, I don't a civil war coming between the Cartel and the citizens.

There is already a war between the Cartel and the gov't but it doesn't involved the ordinary citizen.

Of course, we all know the proper solution here ... legalize the drugs!